Legal Opinion

Denton County v. Beynon

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 29, 2007No. 2-07-066-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DIXON W. HOLMAN, Justice.

I. Introduction

Appellant Denton County, Texas (“Den-ton”) brings this accelerated, interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s order denying its plea to the jurisdiction on the special defect claim of Appellees Dianne Beynon and Roger Beynon, individually and as next friends of Rhiannon Beynon, a minor (“Beynon”). See Tex. Civ. PRAC. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(a)(8) (Vernon Supp. 2007). In three issues, Denton complains that the trial court erred by denying its plea to the jurisdiction because Denton is immune from Beynon’s suit. Because we hold that Beynon…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Bland Independent School District v. BlueTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission v. IT-DavyTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State Department of Highways & Public Transportation v. PayneTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Corbin v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Denton County v. BeynonTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  2. City of Arlington, Texas v. Charles Barnes, Ryan Matthew Robinson, and Carolyn Warren, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2008
  3. City of Arlington, Texas v. Charles Barnes, Ryan Matthew Robinson, and Carolyn Warren, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2008
  4. City of Arlington, Texas v. Charles Barnes, Ryan Matthew Robinson, and Carolyn Warren, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2008
  5. Denton County v. BeynonTexas Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API