Legal Opinion

8131 Roosevelt Corp. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 25, 2002PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SMITH-RIBNER.

In this case 8131 Roosevelt Corporation Va “Pinups” (Pinups) appeals from an or*965der of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County that affirmed the order of the Zoning Board of Adjustment of the City of Philadelphia (Zoning Board) denying Pinups’ application for the legalization of the adult cabaret and go-go style dancing use of its property. Pinups questions whether the cabaret is a constitutionally protected non-conforming use; whether the doctrines of res judicata or collateral estoppel require the grant of a variance; and whether Pinups was entitled to a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Valley View Civic Ass'n v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. City of Pittsburgh v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Township of Haverford v. SpicaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Heidorn AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. Pappas v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dudlik v. Upper Moreland Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Coyle v. City of Lebanon Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. 8131 Roosevelt Corp. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. In re: Appeal by V. Atamanenko & I. Ginsburg ~ Appeal of: V. Atamanenko & I. GinsburgCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
  5. In re: Appeal of L.A. Ballezzi & R. Howard v. The ZB of Adjustment of the City of Philadelphia & 514 S. St., LLCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API