Thigpen v. . Maget
Supreme Court of North Carolina
This was an action to recover a balance alleged to be' due to the plaintiff for rent and advancements to one James Plardy, from whom, it is alleged, the defendants purchased and received property subject to a statutory lien to secure the payment of said rent and advances, heard, upon the report of a referee and exceptions thereto, before Womack, J., at Spring Term, 1890, of the Superior Court of Edgecombe County.
Read the full summary
This was an action to recover a balance alleged to be' due to the plaintiff for rent and advancements to one James Plardy, from whom, it is alleged, the defendants purchased and received property subject to a statutory lien to secure the payment of said rent and advances, heard, upon the report of a referee and exceptions thereto, before Womack, J., at Spring Term, 1890, of the Superior Court of Edgecombe County. The plaintiff alleges in detail that James Hardy rented land of her successively for the years 1884, 1885 and 1886, upon the terms set out in the complaint, to mate crops; that he…
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.
after stating the case: Exceptions to the findings of fact are sent up with the record, but as they present no questions subject to the review of this Court, we take no notice of them.
1. By section 1754 of The Code, when lands shall be rented or leased for agricultural purposes, unless otherwise agreed between the parties thereto, any crops raised on said lands “shall be deemed and held to be vested in possession of the lessor or his assigns at all times until the rents for said land shall be paid,” etc. The lien thus provided for shall be preferred to all other liens, and no part of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Thigpen v. . LeighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
3Cited by3 opinions
- B. W. Ballard & Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
- Rhodes v. Smith-Douglass Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Windsor Bargain House v. WatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908