Legal Opinion

In re Winiarsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 27, 2012Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Respondent Nativ Winiarsky was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the Second Judicial Department on May 8, 1996. At all times relevant to this proceeding, respondent has maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.

The Departmental Disciplinary Committee now seeks an order, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 605.15 (e), disaffirming the Hearing Panel’s findings insofar as it recommended dismissing certain charges, but confirming its sanction recommendation of a public censure. By cross motion, respondent seeks an order…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re BurdenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API