Legal Opinion

Domingos v. Dessau

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 18, 1925No. 16597PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

1. “A ruling of the court in disallowing an amendment to the pleading can not be made a ground of a motion for a new trial.” Simmons v. Lanford, 21 Ga. App. 686 (1) (94 S. E. 907) ; Brown v. Horn, 32 Ga. App. 96 (122 S. E. 710); Boyce v. Day, 3 Ga. App. 275 (1) (59 S. E. 930).

2. After verdict and judgment in favor of the landlord, in a distress-warrant proceeding, the tenant filed a motion for a new trial, which was overruled, and he excepted. The sole contention made by the plaintiff in error in this court being that the court erred in disallowing an amendment to the counter-affidavit, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boyce v. DayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Brown v. HornCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  3. Simmons v. LanfordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Braswell v. PalmerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  2. Fillingame v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API