Legal Opinion

Oliver v. Henry

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 28, 2011No. 1 CA-CV 10-0701Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WINTHROP, Judge.

¶ 1 Defendant, James Henry, appeals the trial court’s ruling that Plaintiff, Paul Oliver, experienced an actual and provable financial loss for diminished value of his automobile after an accident, despite the fact that Oliver did not sell, exchange, or otherwise dispose of the automobile. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 The material facts are uneontested: In October 2008, Oliver purchased a 2008 Jeep Wrangler at a pre-tax price of $23,296. In December 2008, Henry and Oliver were involved in a motor vehicle accident. Henry admitted that his negligence caused the accident, and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Nicoletti v. Westcor, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
  2. United Bank of Arizona v. AllynCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  3. Volkswagen of America, Inc. v. Willard E. Robertson, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  4. Associated Students of the University v. Arizona Board of RegentsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  5. Wiese-GMC, Inc. v. WellsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API