Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 4, 1945No. 15039PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Grice, Justice.

Complaint is made that the trial judge, on the call of the case, refused to continue it. It is recited in the motion for new trial that one ground of the motion to continue was, that the attorneys representing the accused were appointed by the court and were not the counsel of his choice; that the accused did not have sufficient time since the alleged offense was committed, and since his indictment, to make the necessary arrangements with the attorneys of his choice; and on the further ground that appointed counsel did not have sufficient time to investigate and properly…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mann v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  2. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. McFarleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  3. Bond v. Central BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1847
  4. Cannady v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  5. Cochran v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  2. Carnes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  3. Foster v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
  4. Starr v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  5. Stanford v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API