Legal Opinion

Cratty v. City of Chicago

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1905PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. W. H. Hinebaugh, Judge, presiding.

1Per curiam

The city of Chicago sought to pave Diversey avenue from Milwaukee avenue to Crawford avenue, in that city, by special assessment. The original judgment of confirmation was reversed and the cause was remanded by this court in Boyd v. City of Chicago, 187 Ill. 115. Thereafter, the pavement in the meantime having been constructed, the city of Chicago, by virtue of an ordinance passed in November, 1901, filed a petition in the county court of Cook county for the purpose of having a new assessment made to obtain the unpaid amount due on the cost of the improvement. A trial was had in that court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. HulbertIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Holden v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Boyd v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Podbielniak v. PodbielniakAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  3. City of Chicago v. BaldwinIllinois Supreme Court · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API