Legal Opinion

American Electrical Novelty & Mfg. Co. v. Newgold

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided June 1, 1901PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In'Equity. Suit for infringement of patents. On final hearing.

1Opinion of the Court

COXE, District Judge.

This is an equity suit for the infringement of two letters patent owned by the complainant. The first is a design patent, No. 29,939, for a portable lamp body granted to Gustave F. Hitzelberger, assignor to complainant, January 3, 1899. The application was filed December 3, 1898. The specification says:

“As shown in the drawings, the leading and essential feature of this design consists of a unitary lamp body of cylindrical shape, elongated in the direction of its axis and having a bull’s-eye at the forward end thereof. The lamp body is intended for use in a portable…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. American Electrical Novelty Co. v. NewgoldU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1900

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shreckhise v. RitchieCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
  2. American Electrical Novelty & Manufacturing Co. v. NewgoldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1902
  3. Shreckhise v. RitchieDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1946
  4. American Electric Novelty & Mfg. Co. v. Howard Electric Novelty Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1905
  5. American Electrical Novelty & Mfg. Co. v. Howard Electrical Novelty Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API