Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1989No. Crim. 24790Published

1Opinion of the Court

49 Cal.3d 1230 (1989)

783 P.2d 731

265 Cal. Rptr. 144

JAMES LLOYD MITCHELL et al., Petitioners,

v.

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent; THE PEOPLE, Real Party in Interest.

Docket No. Crim. 24790.

Supreme Court of California.

December 28, 1989.

COUNSEL

Joseph Caliore, Dennis Roberts, Robert L. Thorp, Michael Kennedy, Thomas Steel and Emily Graham for Petitioners.

Ephraim Margolin and Amitai Schwartz as Amici Curiae on behalf of Petitioners.

No appearance for Respondent.

John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Daniel J. Kremer and Steve White, Chief Assistant Attorneys…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Bridges v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Hicks Ex Rel. Feiock v. FeiockSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API