Legal Opinion

Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada v. Kiester

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 5, 1950No. 33309PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The construction of the exclusion clause of a life-insurance policy, “participating, as a passenger or otherwise, in aviation or aeronautics,” is of first impression in this State, although this clause and others almost identical with it have received attention from other courts throughout the country. Two fundamental principles of law of force in this State—first, that policies of insurance, when susceptible of more than one construction, should be most strictly construed against the insurance company (Atlas Assurance Co. v. Lies, 70 Ga. App. 162, 27 S.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hartol Products Corp. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. Johnson v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  3. Masonic Accident Insurance v. JacksonIndiana Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Ætna Life Insurance v. PadgettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  5. Bew v. Travelers' Insurance Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1921

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Western Reserve Life Ins. Co. v. MeadowsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API