Legal Opinion

Sloman v. Reilly

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1893PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Certiorari to review two orders imposing penalties upon petitioner for contempt. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

Plaintiff is an attorney at law, and was engaged in the trial of a slander suit, wherein Archibald W. Beers was.plaintiff and Charles M. Payment was defendant. Defendant was the presiding judge. During the progess of '•the trial the court entered an order finding plaintiff guilty ■of contempt committed in the immediate view and presence of the court, and imposing a penalty therefor. At the conclusion of the trial, and after the jury had retired for consultation, the court found plaintiff guilty of another contempt, for which a penalty was imposed. The validity of. these orders is the question…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Turner v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Swett v. ThorkildsenMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. GildersleeveSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API