Legal Opinion

Dieleman v. Sendlein

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1983No. 14460PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*769OPINION

2Per curiam

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court ordering the partition of a 120-acre parcel of real estate located in Lincoln County. The appellant seeks reversal on the grounds (1) that there is insufficient evidence in the record to support the district judge’s ruling and (2) that the court erred in not referring the matter to three masters as prescribed in NRS 39.120.1 We reject appellant’s contentions and affirm the judgment of partition.

SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

Appellant Dieleman filed a complaint to quiet title to the property, the subject of this action. Respondent Sendlein…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Old Aztec Mine, Inc. v. BrownNevada Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Botsford v. Van RiperNevada Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Godfrey v. GilsdorfNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Las Vegas MacHine & Engineering Works, Inc. v. RoemischNevada Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Sherman Gardens Company v. LongleyNevada Supreme Court · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Posner v. TasselyNevada Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API