Legal Opinion
Lano v. Rochester Germicide Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 26, 1962No. 38,269, 38,342Published
1Opinion of the Court
261 Minn. 556 (1962)
113 N.W. (2d) 460
KARL W. LANO
v.
ROCHESTER GERMICIDE COMPANY.
Nos. 38,269, 38,342.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
January 26, 1962.
Culhane & Culhane, for appellant.
Cant, Haverstock, Beardsley, Gray & Plant and James S. Simonson, for respondent.
OTIS, JUSTICE.
These appeals, which have been consolidated for hearing, are from an order denying plaintiff's motion for substituted findings or for a new trial and from a judgment in favor of defendant.
This action was brought to recover a sum which plaintiff asserts is presently payable under a profit-sharing pension plan instituted when he…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Clark v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Home Savings Bank v. GertenbachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Malone v. MelnickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Northland Produce Co. v. StephensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- Molburg v. Hunter Hosiery, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1960
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.