Legal Opinion

Sika v. Chicago & North-Western Railway Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1867PublishedCited by 17 opinions

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Jefferson County. Action for the negligent killing of plaintiff’s cattle. Plaintiff was permitted to testify in bis own behalf, against defendant’s objection, no notice having been given of bis intended examination.

Read the full summary

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Jefferson County. Action for the negligent killing of plaintiff’s cattle. Plaintiff was permitted to testify in bis own behalf, against defendant’s objection, no notice having been given of bis intended examination. He lived east of the defendant’s track, and pastured bis cattle in a field west of it, from which, the evidence for plaintiff tended to show, they escaped upon the track, in consequence of the fence along it, built by defendant, having been burned down some nine days before. Plaintiff bad constructed bars in said fence, and was in the habit of…

1Opinion of the CourtDixon, C. J.

A statute which refers to and adopts the provisions of another statute, is not repealed by the subsequent repeal of the statute adopted. Wood v. Hustis, 17 Wis., 416; 19 Wis., 453. Chapter 64, Laws of 1859, adopted the notice required by section 3, of chap. 134, Laws of 1858 (R. S., p. 818). The repeal of section 3 by chapter 116, Laws of 1864, does not obviate the necessity of giving the notice prescribed by that section in the cases provided for in chapter 64.

No notice of the intended examination of the plaintiff as a witness in bis own behalf was given, and bis admission against the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Crosby v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Wood v. HustisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Van Pelt v. HilliardSupreme Court of Florida · 1918
  2. City of Pond Creek v. HaskellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Quinlan v. Houston & Texas Central Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1896
  4. State v. ArmstrongNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Curry v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1878

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API