Legal Opinion

Town of North Hempstead v. Village of North Hills

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1974PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMario Pittoni, J.

Defendant village moves to dismiss plaintiff town’s complaint on the ground that the town is barred from bringing this action by section 7-706 of the Village Law, that the town has no standing to sue, that the town is not an aggrieved person and that the complaint is merely conclusory.

The town’s contention is that the cluster zoning provisions of the village ordinances violate section 7-738 of the Village Law, that they are defective in that they were not adopted pursuant to a proper Planning Board study, that they do not embody a comprehensive plan, thus permitting a case by case rezoning of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Holroyd v. . Town of Indian LakeNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  2. MATTER OF PERRY v. Town of Cherry ValleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1954

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Town of North Hempstead v. Village of North HillsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API