Legal Opinion · Dissent

Horn v. New York Times

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 25, 2003Published

1DissentSmith, J.

Because I believe that plaintiff Sheila Horn has stated a claim for breach of an implied contract between herself and defendant the New York Times, I dissent. I would affirm the order of the Appellate Division.

Plaintiff began her employment as a physician with the Times in 1995. In 1996, she became the full-time Associate Medical Director of the Times’ Medical Department. Sometime in April 1999, however, Dr. Horn was terminated. In April 2000, she commenced an action, alleging breach of contract (first cause) and an entitlement to punitive damages (second cause). In May 2000, the Times filed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Sokoloff v. Harriman Estates Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Wieder v. SkalaNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp. v. MorgenthauNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Horn v. New York TimesNew York Supreme Court · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API