Legal Opinion

Hanson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 6, 1990No. 156-90PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

2Per curiam

Appeal is taken from a conviction of driving while intoxicated. After trial by jury, the court assessed appellant’s punishment at ninety days confinement and a three hundred dollar fine. Both the fine and jail time were probated.

On direct appeal, the Court of Appeals found the evidence insufficient to support appellant’s conviction and, therefore, remanded the cause to the trial court with an order to enter a judgment of acquittal. Hanson v. State, 781 S.W.2d 445 (Tex.App.—Ft. Worth 1989). We granted the State’s petition for discretionary…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hanson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  2. August v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. McCaffreyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  2. State v. Curl, Jerry Wayne, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
  3. Heath James Grimes v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2008
  4. Heath James Grimes v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2008
  5. Heath James Grimes v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API