Legal Opinion

People v. Zambino

Utica City Court

Decided October 12, 1973PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHarold H. Hymes, J.

The defendants are all charged with violating section 18-20 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Utica, New York, in that they “ did remain at the T. R. Proctor Park in the City of Utica, after the closing of the park.” The *609violations are alleged to have occurred after 10:00 p.m. in the city park.

The ordinance which .the defendants are alleged to have violated reads as follows: “Section 18-20. Hours of Operation of Parks. The public parks shall be open to the public daily from 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.”

This section, which appears in the code of ordinances, was derived from ordinance No. 325…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. VetriNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  2. People v. . PhyfeNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. People v. ShakunNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  4. People v. AdamkiewiczNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  5. People v. Bart's Restaurant Corp.Criminal Court of the City of New York · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. ByrneCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API