Legal Opinion

Paddock v. Dennies

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided September 29, 1988No. 88-C-1633PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PLOTKIN, Judge.

In the most recent case to address this issue, Comeaux v. Poindexter, 527 So.2d 1184 (La.App.3d Cir.1988), the court held that a husband’s loss of consortium claim related back to the filing of the original petition under the exact factual circumstances as those in the instant case. Like Mr. Dennies, Mr. Comeaux filed an original petition on behalf of himself and his wife and daughter injured in an automobile accident within the one-year prescriptive period, then filed an amended and supplemental petition claiming loss of consortium three years after the accident. In the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gunter v. PlaucheSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
  2. Warriner v. RussoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1979

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Phillips v. PalumboLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. Farber v. US Fidelity & Guar. Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API