Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 13, 1994No. 93-2618Published

1Per curiam

In appealing his sentence, Truman Armstrong claims that the trial court did not award him the proper amount of credit for the time he has served in prison. Armstrong has failed to provide this court with a record establishing error and, therefore, his sentence must be affirmed. See Williams v. State, 568 So.2d 1276, 1277 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990), quashed on other grounds, 594 So.2d 290 (Fla.1992). We note that Armstrong may properly raise this issue before the trial court by filing a motion to correct sentence pursuant to rule 3.800 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.

AFFIRMED.

PETERSON,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  2. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API