Legal Opinion

Tinsley v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 11, 1923No. 14646Published

1Opinion of the CourtBloodwortii, J.

1. “ The evidence that before the trial the accused forfeited his appearance bond [the writ of scire facias] was properly admitted. ‘ While not conclusive, an order of the trial judge forfeiting the defendant’s recognizance on his failure to appear for trial is some evidence of his flight, and is admissible in evidence as a circumstance to be considered by the jury in determining his guilt or innocence.’ State v. Kesner, 72 Kan. 88 (3).” Jones v. State, 26 Ga. App. 636 (3) (107 S. E. 166).

2. On the trial of the defendant on the charge of making intoxicating liquor the sheriff swore that at…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Conley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  2. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  3. Plummer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API