Legal Opinion

Dean v. Consumer Product Safety Commission

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided October 31, 2008No. 2008-3142PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

Mr. David Dean petitions for review of the decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board, Docket Nos. AT3443050147-M-l and AT3443050179-M-1 (M.S.P.B. Dec. 6, 2007), denying his request for corrective action under the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994 (USERRA) and the Veterans Employment Opportunities Act of 1998 (VEOA). We affirm the decision of the Board.

BACKGROUND

By letter dated April 30, 2004, Mr. Dean applied for the position of Products Safety Investigator (GS-1801-7/9) with the Consumer Products Safety Commission (the Agency) in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sheehan v. Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  2. Donald H. Kumferman v. Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  3. Barry J. Abell v. Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
  4. Joseph v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Madden v. Rolls Royce Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  2. Burroughs v. Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  3. Harold Gause v. Mark Esper, SecretaryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
  4. Rick Madden v. Rolls-Royce CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API