Legal Opinion

Holmes v. Bennett

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 29, 1934No. 23474PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The plaintiff sued to recover for an alleged conversion by the defendant of $21.50 of money belonging to the plaintiff. As the burden of proof is upon the plaintiff, he can not establish a conversion unless he establishes title to the money in himself. There is no presumption one way or the other whether an assignment of wages or salary is an assignment of the total amount earned, or is an assignment of only a portion of the wages or salary earned.

There is no evidence whatsoever tending to show that the defendant’s assignment to the plaintiff covered the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rivers v. Wright & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. King Bros. v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  3. Hubbard v. Bibb Brokerage Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  4. Etheredge v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  5. Henry & Co. v. BryanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bell Finance Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API