Dennis v. State

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Appellant admits that in the disposition of some of his bills the court is not without authority in following Craft v. State (Tex. Crim. Rep.), 295 S. W. 617. He insists, however, that the opinion in the latter case is wrong. It is our conviction that such opinion is fortified by the many authorities cited in support of it. So believing it has been directly followed in Jenkins v. State (Tex. Crim. Rep.), 299 S. W. 642; Laake v. State (Tex. Crim. Rep). 299 S. W. 643. To reopen a discussion of the question would be profitless.

One ground of appellant’s…