Legal Opinion
New York v. Shinnecock Indian Nation
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided February 7, 2008No. 03-CV-3243 (JFB)(ARL), 03-CV-3466 (JFB)(ARL)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOSEPH F. BIANCO, District Judge:
In the above-captioned consolidated actions, plaintiffs New York State, the New York State Racing and Wagering Board, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (collectively, the “State”), and the Town of Southampton (the “Town”) (collectively, “plaintiffs”) sought to permanently enjoin defendants, the Shinnecock Indian Nation (the “Nation” or the “Shinnecock”), and its tribal officials sued in their official capacity (collectively, “defendants”), from constructing a casino and conducting certain gaming on a parcel of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Village of Belle Terre v. BoraasSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Burton v. City of Belle GladeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- Peregrine Myanmar Ltd. And Peregrine Capital Myanmar Ltd. v. Miriam Marshall SegalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Steven Hill v. William ShelanderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State of New York v. Shinnecock Indian NationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Ram v. LalDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Absolut Care of Allegany, LLC v. Anderson Alexander PLLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2025
- Bradshaw v. MarshallDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2023
- Bradshaw v. MarshallDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.