Commonwealth v. Grohowski
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
STEVENS, J.:
¶ 1 This is an appeal from the order dated August 23, 2007, and entered on August 24, 2007, by the Court of Common Pleas of Northumberland County, following the granting of Appellee’s/cross-Appel-lant’s, Kazimir Grohowski’s, motion for ex*114traordinary relief and awarding of a new trial. Herein, the Commonwealth contends that the motion for extraordinary relief was improperly granted in that (1) such a motion is improper to raise allegations of ineffectiveness of counsel, and (2) even if not improper, trial counsel was not ineffective where Appellee did not prove he was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BurtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. McBrideSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Commonwealth v. CelestinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Com. v. AskewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. AskewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
3Cited by29 opinions
- Com. v. Wilson, E.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Commonwealth v. GrohowskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Com. v. Baker, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
- Com. v. Baldwin, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- Com. v. Dodds, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.