Legal Opinion

Risher v. Risher

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 30, 1899No. Appeal, No. 80PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal, No. 80, Oct. T., 1899, by defendants, from decree of C. P. No. 2, Allegheny Co., July T., 1897, No. 644, on bill in equity. Bill in equity for an account.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 80, Oct. T., 1899, by defendants, from decree of C. P. No. 2, Allegheny Co., July T., 1897, No. 644, on bill in equity. Bill in equity for an account. Before White, P. J. The caáe was referred to D. F. Patterson, Esq., who reported the facts to be as follows : In the spring of 1897, John M. Risher, one of the defendants, was indebted to each of his three codistributees, in part, at least, on account of his having drawn out more than his distributive share of the funds received by defendants as attorneys in fact. On April 14,1897, he executed the writing in evidence marked exhibit…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Dean,

The facts in this case have been fully and clearly stated by the learned referee. A number of the points in controversy decided in the court below are practically eliminated here on this appeal, because not pressed in the argument. In fact, but one is left about which there is any serious contention, to wit: was the sum of 110,858.22, the interest of John M. Risher in the Glassport mortgage, and by him assigned to appellees, legally appropriated by the assignees of that interest ?

The assignment was made April 14, 1897, and placed on record April 29, fifteen days…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pardee v. MarkleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  2. Hollister v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1867
  3. Reed v. WardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1853
  4. Martin v. DraherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1836

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Page v. WilsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Coffin v. Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Carson v. Cook County Liquor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Chestnut Street Trust & Saving Fund Co. v. HartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  5. Fischbach & Moore, Inc. v. Philadelphia National BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API