Legal Opinion
Ickes v. Bache Halsey Stuart Shields, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided August 10, 1982No. 1 CA-CIV 6292PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CORCORAN, Judge.
The primary issue on this appeal is whether a factual issue was raised precluding summary judgment against Bache Halsey Stuart Shields, Inc. (Bache) for conversion of a forged check with a forged endorsement. We affirm.
The pertinent facts, briefly stated, which give rise to this litigation are as follows. In January, 1981 appellee Rose Ickes (Mrs. Ickes) was introduced to Roger Giles by her nephew and subsequently rented Giles a room in her home. Giles studied the stock market and on several occasions advised Mrs. Ickes to purchase stock. Mrs. Ickes’ confidence in Giles…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Salsman v. National Community Bank of RutherfordNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- Twellman v. Lindell Trust Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- Cooper v. Union BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- National Bank v. Refrigerated Transport Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Portonova v. WilkinsonArizona Supreme Court · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gilbert v. Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
- Cook v. Great Western Bank & TrustCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Maxfield v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Inventory Locator Service, Inc. v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1989
- First City National Bank v. Federal Deposit InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.