Bradberry v. . Hooks

The case is disclosed by the testimony, and the charge of the judge, as stated himself, was as follows:

The trespass for which the action was brought was charged to have been committed between the parallel lines in the diagram B C and N Y. Hooks' 90-acre patent was ten years older than the one under which the plaintiff claimed; Hooks' 100-acre patent is seven or eight years younger than the plaintiff's. The boundaries of Hooks' 90-acre patent are delineated in the diagram, and the beginning is at the index at E, then to F, G, H, and I, at another index, and thence to the beginning. The…