In re Neyland & McKeithen
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
In Bankruptcy. In the matter of bankruptcy proceedings of Ney-land & McKeithen. On objections to discharge. Objections sustained on the opinion and findings of F. M. West, special master and referee, which are as follows: To the Court: On September . 10, 1909, by proper order of this court, the undersigned was appointed as special master to find the facts and report my conclusions thereon upon certain objections filed by creditors to the discharge of the above-named…
Read the full summary
In Bankruptcy. In the matter of bankruptcy proceedings of Ney-land & McKeithen. On objections to discharge. Objections sustained on the opinion and findings of F. M. West, special master and referee, which are as follows: To the Court: On September . 10, 1909, by proper order of this court, the undersigned was appointed as special master to find the facts and report my conclusions thereon upon certain objections filed by creditors to the discharge of the above-named bankrupts. I find the facts as follows: On June 7, 1909, C. H. Neyland and C. W. McKeithen, composing the partnership of Neyland…
1Opinion of the Court
NILES, District Judge.
After a careful examination of the record submitted to me, the report of the special master upon objections to discharge, I find no reason to disturb the conclusions reached by said special master. Tf a statement is materially false, and made for the purpose of obtaining property, and such property was sold upon the truth and faith of such statement, that credit was obtained because of the said statement, and that the statement was made by the bankrupt, a discharge will be denied the bankrupt. I concur fully in the findings of the referee.
2Cited by3 opinions
- Myers v. International Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Curlee Clothing Co. v. HammSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
- Rowland v. LovettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932