Legal Opinion

Standard Lumber Co. v. Hosmer

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 25, 1932No. 6 Div. 185PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.

This case was submitted to the jury upon the fourth count alone, which was for work and labor done by the plaintiff for the defendant. Under this count the plaintiff was entitled to recover as for any commissions due him for lumber sold and collected for by the defendant, less, of course, any advances or payments previously made him by the defendant.

As to the plaintiff’s right to recover for profits on lumber not shipped and sold under the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company order, a different question arises. It is, of course, the rule that when money is due under an express contract and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Navco Hardwood Co. v. BecksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  2. Southern Fuel Co. v. Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  3. Elrod Lumber Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Solomon Bros. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  2. Wayne Pump Co. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  3. Van Valkenburgh v. HoldenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API