Legal Opinion
Daly v. Toomey
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 10, 1963No. Civ. A. 1876-59PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PINE, District Judge.
Defendants, hereinafter referred to as-the Toomeys, Sinclair and Muldrow, have-filed a joint motion to enter judgments-in their favor under Rule 50(b) Fed.R. Civ.P., or in the alternative for a new-trial.
Their Memorandum of Points and Authorities attached thereto does not discuss two contentions vigorously asserted at the trial. However, their motion does-state that the Court erred “in refusing to grant the motions of defendants for directed verdicts at the close of plaintiff’s, case,” and that “the verdicts of the jury are contrary to law.” This general language is…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Gunning v. CooleySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Beck v. . CarterNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Shewmaker v. Capital Transit Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
- Jackson v. Capital Transit Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- Firfer Et Ux. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Smith, Mary Jo v. Sheraton WA HotelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- William T. Muldrow v. Virginia Warren Daly, James C. Toomey v. Virginia Warren Daly, Sinclair Refining Company v. Virginia Warren DalyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- Sinclair Refining Company v. James C. Toomey and John J. Toomey, Trustees, Under the Will of Ellen C. Toomey, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- Smith, Mary Jo v. Sheraton WA HotelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998