Legal Opinion

Haupt v. Pittaluga

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 28, 1869PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Case 54 — FORCIBLE ENTRY — CITED 8 Marshall, 347, Chiles v. Stephens. CITED Civil Code, section 500.

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE HARDIN

delivered the opinion op the court.

The appellant, being the assignee and holder of a lease from the appellee for a term of five years, to expire in October, 1864, of a house and lot in the city of Louisville, subleased the premises to Joseph Burge in December. 1867, and the appellee shortly thereafter proceeded to dispossess Burge by a writ of forcible detainer, upon which an inquisition was found for the plaintiff, which Burge traversed; and, pending this litigation, Burge entered into an agreement with the appellant, from whom he acquired *494the possession, to restore the same to…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ingram v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  2. Nevin v. Louisville Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API