Legal Opinion

Hite v. Long

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided May 28, 1828PublishedCited by 16 opinions

The statement of the ease, as exhibited by the Record, is so fully set forth by the Judge who delivered the opinion of the Court, that it is unnecessary to present it here.

1Opinion of the Court

Judge Coaltee.*

This is an action of Trespass, instituted by James Long, against Isaac Hite, in the Superior Court of Law for Frederick County, on the 31st July, 1818.

The first Declaration filed in the cause (at October Rules, 1S18,) is for this: that the said Hite, wjth force and arms, stopped, in the highway, a waggon and team belonging to the Plaintiff, and then in his possession, and took there-from one of the horses belonging to the team of the Plaintifl, in possession of the Plaintiff, and the property of the Plaintiff, of the value of $>200, and converted him to his own use, and other…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bendernagle v. CocksNew York Supreme Court · 1838
  2. Jones v. Morris Plan BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1937
  3. Zetelle v. MyersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1869
  4. O'Neal v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
  5. Funk v. FunkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API