Hudson v. . Cozart
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
The action is to enforce the specific performance of a contract to convey a parcel or lot of land in the city of Wilson, pursuant to an option to purchase the same, contained in a written agreement executed by defendants to the plaintiff.
On the hearing, it was admitted that the said lot was owned by the five named defendants, the interest being as follows: one-third by S.W. Smith, one third by W. P. Anderson, one-sixth by U. H. Cozart, and one-twelfth each by Eagles and Carr. It further appeared that the defendants had executed the written agreement, and that no deed for the lot had been…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- President of the Bank of Columbia v. HagnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Carman v. . PultzNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Winders v. . KenanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
- Blood v. GoodrichNew York Supreme Court · 1832
- Trogden v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pearce v. Third Ave. Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Kirk v. First Georgia Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Kottler v. MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Hinson v. . ShugartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Carr v. Good Shepherd Home, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.