Legal Opinion

English v. Moore

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 2, 1922No. 12146PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Complaint; from city court of Americus — Judge Harper. January 6, 1921.

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. In a suit upon’ an alleged contract to which the defendant was not a party but which was entered into between the plaintiff and a third person, the defendant may be held liable upon the theory that he held himself out to the world as a partner with the third person, and that the plaintiff was therefore misled, and, acting upon the faith of such ostensible relationship, dealt with the third person as a partner of the defendant and thereby entered into a contract with the purported parnership. This proposition of law was properly given in charge to the jury. They were properly instructed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. American Cotton College v. Atlanta Newspaper UnionSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  2. Mims v. Brook & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Andrews v. MessinaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  2. English v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API