Legal Opinion
Fieldbridge Associates, LLC v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 9, 2011PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*599The determination of the Division of Housing and Community Renewal (hereinafter DHCR) to uphold a revocation of the petitioner’s major capital improvements (hereinafter MCI) rent increase had a rational basis in the record and was not arbitrary and capricious (see Matter of 41-42 Owners Corp. v New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal, 295 AD2d 348 [2002]; see also Matter of 370 Manhattan Ave. Co., L.L.C. v New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal, 11 AD3d 370, 372 [2004]; cf. Matter of Gilman v New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal, 99 NY2d 144 [2002]; Matter of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gilman v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- 370 Manhattan Ave. Co. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Horowitz v. State of New York Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- 41-42 Owners Corp. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
3Cited by1 opinion
- Matter of Jackson Hgts. 35, LLC v. New York State Div. of Hous. & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015