Steinfeld v. Taylor
Appellate Court of Illinois
Memorandum,—Assumpsit on promissory note. Appeal from tluCircuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Richard 8. Tuthill, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1893, and affirmed.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Waterman
Appellant brought suit in his own ¿ame for a note reading as follows:
“ $090. Chicago, Nov. 15, 1892.
Four months after date I promise to pay to the order of Wm. M. Taylor Mantel & Grate Co. six hundred and ninety dollars, payable at the Metropolitan National Bank, value received, with interest at 6 per cent per annum.
Louis E. Steinfeld.”
Indorsement upon said note: “Pay to the order of the American Exchange National Bank, Chicago.
Wm. M. Taylor Mantel «fe Grate Go.
Wm. M. Taylor, Prop.”
Amasa Jones testified that there was due for principal and interest on said note $114.15.
The Court: Q. What…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Curtiss v. MartinIllinois Supreme Court · 1858
3Cited by3 opinions
- Munoz v. LingHawaii Supreme Court · 1939
- Thompson v. Economy Furniture Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1896
- Ætna Iron Works v. OwenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896