Legal Opinion

Crabtree v. Kirby

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 19, 1932No. 7 Div. 96PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

This is a contest of a claim of homestead exemption from the collection of a decree for costs adjudged against respondents in a statutory suit in equity to fix and declare a disputed boundary line.

The exemption claimants, appellants, contend that such at decree is for a “debt,” as distinguished from a “debt contracted”; fbat section 7882, Code, grants a homestead exemption from all debts, and not alone from “debts contracted,” as was expressly provided in the Code of 1896, section 2033. When that section went into the Code of 1907 (section 4160), the words “contracted after the twenty-third…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miller v. MarxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  2. Erlenbach v. CoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  3. Beckert v. WhitlockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  4. Morscheimer v. WoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  5. Pinckard v. FreemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Coon v. CoonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  2. Coon v. CoonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API