Legal Opinion

Fulmer v. Bates

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1907PublishedCited by 3 opinions

FROM SHELBY. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Shelhv County.— F. H. Heiskell, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the Court

MR. Special Justice Hendersoin

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Defendant, Bates, for the consideration of $7,750, conveyed by deed to complainant, Fulmer, certain real estate in Memphis by the following description:

“Lots Nos. 1 and 2 of part of lot 5, block 53, of the plan of South Memphis, fronting 37% feet, each, on the south side of Linden' street, and running back south, between parallel lines, 154 feet, to a twenty-foot alley in the rear.”

The claim is that no alley of any kind exists, or ever existed, in the rear of said lots, and that the covenants of said deed have been breached by…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wimpey v. SmartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  2. Interborough Rapid Transit Co. v. LittlefieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  3. Shaver v. Title Guaranty & Trust Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API