General Land Office v. Rutherford Oil Corp.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
SHANNON, Chief Justice.
Appellant General Land Office and others 1 seek to set aside the summary judgment of the district court of Travis County in a declaratory judgment suit. By its judgment, the district court declared that the GLO is not authorized by Tex.Nat.Resources Code §§ 52.135 and 52.137 to adjudicate contract rights of parties to a mineral lease. Appellees are Rutherford Oil Corporation and others. 2 This Court will affirm the judgment.
The summary judgment proof shows that Rutherford is the lessee and the GLO is the lessor of a state oil and gas lease, M-49829. The construction of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Exxon Corp. v. MiddletonTexas Supreme Court · 1981
- Stauffer v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1961
- Railroad Commission of Texas v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1975
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Railroad CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1943
- Duncan, Tax Collector v. GablerTexas Supreme Court · 1948
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. Flag-Redfern Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1993
- Black v. Dallas County Bail Bond Board, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1994
- Municipal Administrative Services, Inc. v. City of Beaumont, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1998
- General Land Office v. Flag-Redfern Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1990
- State v. Flag-Redfern Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1993