Legal Opinion

General Land Office v. Rutherford Oil Corp.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 13, 1991No. 3-90-037-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHANNON, Chief Justice.

Appellant General Land Office and others 1 seek to set aside the summary judgment of the district court of Travis County in a declaratory judgment suit. By its judgment, the district court declared that the GLO is not authorized by Tex.Nat.Resources Code §§ 52.135 and 52.137 to adjudicate contract rights of parties to a mineral lease. Appellees are Rutherford Oil Corporation and others. 2 This Court will affirm the judgment.

The summary judgment proof shows that Rutherford is the lessee and the GLO is the lessor of a state oil and gas lease, M-49829. The construction of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Exxon Corp. v. MiddletonTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Stauffer v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Railroad Commission of Texas v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Railroad CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Duncan, Tax Collector v. GablerTexas Supreme Court · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. Flag-Redfern Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Black v. Dallas County Bail Bond Board, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1994
  3. Municipal Administrative Services, Inc. v. City of Beaumont, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1998
  4. General Land Office v. Flag-Redfern Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  5. State v. Flag-Redfern Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API