Legal Opinion

McCarthy v. Aetna Life Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 14, 1997PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Tom, J.

The issue on appeal is whether, under the narrow circumstances of this case, the insured may change the designation of beneficiary on a life insurance policy, nunc pro tunc, by means of a testamentary disposition when the insurance company, by paying the proceeds of the policy to the court, has waived technical compliance with its change of beneficiary requirements.

The relevant facts are essentially undisputed. This is a tragic case in which the insured, while still a young man, and shortly after his 1972 marriage to plaintiff, was diagnosed in 1973 as suffering…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Doss v. KalasArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Considine v. ConsidineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  3. Cable v. Prudential InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  4. Lopez v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. Kane v. Union Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ministers & Missionaries Benefit Board v. SnowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
  2. In re the Estate of TrigoboffNew York Surrogate's Court · 1998
  3. Ministers & Missionaries v. SnowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API