Legal Opinion

Tallman v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 15, 1922Published

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

Elliott Tallman prosecutes this appeal to reverse a judgment of conviction against him of malicious mischief charged to have been committed by killing a dog belonging to Roger Crowe.

This is the second appeal of this case, and the opinion on the former appeal is reported in 151 Ark. 438, under the style of Tallman v. State.

Upon the remand of the case for a new trial, Tail-man filed a petition for a change of venue, supported by the affidavits of two witnesses in the manner prescribed by .the statute. Both of the witnesses testified that they were well acquainted with the inhabitants in all…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dewein v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  2. Jordan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  3. Polk v. StephensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
  4. Merritt v. HintonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  5. Wilmans v. BordwellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API