Legal Opinion

Teas v. Endicott

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 13, 2007No. 06-3321PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge.

William Teas was convicted in 2001 of arson and possessing a Molotov cocktail. He did not file a timely appeal. During 2002 he asked Wisconsin’s courts to allow an untimely appeal. They declined. Teas commenced a collateral attack in state court during 2005, arguing among other things that his lawyer had furnished ineffective assistance by missing the deadline appeal. He also continued to demand privilege of a belated appeal. On June 2005, the Supreme Court of Wisconsin granted his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, but the only relief this afforded to allow the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Clay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Carey v. SaffoldSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Evans v. ChavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Terry v. Anderson v. Jon E. Litscher, SecretaryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  5. Casey Bridges v. Curtis JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Huusko v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  2. Losh v. FabianCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  3. Foxworth v. St. AmandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  4. Ray v. SchwochertDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2011
  5. Sallie v. HumphreyDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2011

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API