Haugland v. Hoyt
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
PEDERSON, Justice.
Duwayne and Gladys Hoyt (hereinafter Hoyt) appealed from a judgment of the district court compelling them to specifically perform an option contract requiring that they convey certain farmlands to Sigurd Haugland (hereinafter Haugland). Haug-land, being aggrieved by a finding of fact that the transaction between them created an equitable mortgage, cross-appealed from that part of the judgment which accordingly required him to pay Hoyt interest charges for the five-year period involved. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
Hoyt and Haugland are brothers-in-law and both…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Matter of Estate of RakettiNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- Western Tire, Inc. v. SkredeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. CowgerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- Wessels v. WhetstoneNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- Knorr v. NorbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.