Legal Opinion

Haugland v. Hoyt

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1978No. Civ. 9463PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEDERSON, Justice.

Duwayne and Gladys Hoyt (hereinafter Hoyt) appealed from a judgment of the district court compelling them to specifically perform an option contract requiring that they convey certain farmlands to Sigurd Haugland (hereinafter Haugland). Haug-land, being aggrieved by a finding of fact that the transaction between them created an equitable mortgage, cross-appealed from that part of the judgment which accordingly required him to pay Hoyt interest charges for the five-year period involved. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Hoyt and Haugland are brothers-in-law and both…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of RakettiNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Western Tire, Inc. v. SkredeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. CowgerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Wessels v. WhetstoneNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Knorr v. NorbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API