Legal Opinion

Ohio Loan & Discount Co. v. Siemen

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1943No. 29604PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.

The sole question for determina-’ tion is whether under the facts narrated the Erie Bail-road Company is amenable to garnishment proceedings in Ohio to require it to apply a part of the salaries of its employees Siemen and Murray, payable in New York, to the. satisfaction of plaintiff’s judgment.

The railroad company says it is not, because the attachment and garnishment statutes of Ohio do not have extraterritorial effect.

Section 1579-11, General Code, gives the Municipal Court of Cleveland jurisdiction in ancillary and supplemental proceedings before and after judgment, including attachment…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ashton Park Apartments, Ltd. v. LeborDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2003
  2. Commodigy OG Vegas Holdings, LLC v. ADM Labs,et al.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2019
  3. PCA-Corrections, LLC v. Akron Healthcare LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
  4. Stifel Financial Corporation v. IannarinoDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API