Legal Opinion
People v. McKiernan
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 1, 1994PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Term should be reversed and a new trial ordered.
Following a bench trial, defendant was convicted of driving without insurance, failing to display rear lamps and driving while intoxicated (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 319 [1]; § 375 [2] [a] [3]; § 1192 [2]). The record indicates that on July 20, 1990 at his arraignment on the charges, defendant agreed to be represented by Legal Aid. At a subsequent appearance on August 20, 1990 defendant disputed an assertion by the court that defendant had failed to provide verification to the unit which…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- People v. DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. JamesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. ColemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Carney v. CarneyNew York Supreme Court · 2016
- People v. PedrickCity of New York Municipal Court · 2011
- People v. Rivera (Senate)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2019