Legal Opinion

Claim of Insana v. Nordenholt Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 8, 1920PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the defendants, Nordenholt Corporation and another, from an award of the State Industrial Commission, entered in the office of said Commission on the 3d day of February, 1919, and also from an award and decision dated the 16th day of June, 1919, and entered in the office of said Commission. (See 193 App. Div. 929; 195 id. -—.)

1Opinion of the Court

Kiley, J.:

The appellants contend that the notice of injury and death required by section 18 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law was not given to the employer and that death was caused by acute cardiac dilatation, chronic valvular disease of the heart, and that the accident alleged to have happened to the deceased in no way contributed toward such fatality. On May 15, 1918, Guiseppe Insana, with others, was working for the appellant, employer, at its pier in Brooklyn, N. Y. They were unloading a cargo of sacks of hard red cement, each sack weighing 145 pounds. Five minutes before quitting time…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Claim of Nestor v. Pabst Brewing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Claim of Insana v. Nordenholt Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  2. Claim of Insana v. Nordenholt Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API