Legal Opinion

Estate of Gladys Tipler

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided December 17, 1998No. 02A01-9707-PB-00173PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOLLY KIRBY LILLARD, Judge.

This is a will contest. The decedent executed a will, and later executed a holo graphic codicil to the will. The holograph directed that, if her husband predeceased her, her property should be distributed in accordance with his will. The decedent’s husband predeceased her. Enforcement of the holographic codicil was challenged in court by the decedent’s heirs. The trial court applied the doctrine of facts of independent significance and ordered the decedent’s assets be distributed in accordance with her deceased husband’s will. We affirm.

Mrs. Gladys S. Tipler…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Union Carbide Corp. v. HuddlestonTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Presley v. HanksCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1989
  3. In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of PiffardNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  4. McDonald v. LedfordTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Moore v. NeelyTennessee Supreme Court · 1963

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Estate of Hamilton v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  2. In Re the Estate of MilamCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
  3. Estate of Annie Hamilton v. Walter Morris,et al.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  4. In Re Estate of Ivy Lonzo ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2018
  5. In Re: Estate Of Wanda Joyce WatkinsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API